not to be confused with blairfoundation.com which already exists. And if anyone's up for a laugh all variants of blair-foundation are unregistered plus a few variants of blairfoundation are still up for grabs.
January 7, 2007 at 3:16 PM
Anonymous
said...
By my reckoning (and, according to my calendar), 4 November 2006 wasn't last week. Or even last month. </pedant>
On 10 October 2004, the Mail on Sunday published an article suggesting that there was a link between Martha Greene, a businesswoman and close friend of Cherie Blair, and Peter Foster. The newspaper stated that it had seen emails between Foster, a convicted fraudster, and Ms Greene in which she discussed assisting him with a business venture selling diet pills.
Within days the claimant's solicitors had complained to the newspaper stating that she did not send any of the emails which the paper referred to and that she was not connected with Foster in any way. At the same time, the newspaper wrote to the claimant asking for details about the contents of the emails in preparation for a further article the following Sunday. The claimant replied that the emails were forgeries and that she opposed publication of what she claimed were the false allegations of a conman.
The claimant sought an injunction on Saturday 16 October to restrain the Mail on Sunday from publishing the proposed article about her. Mr Justice Fulford refused to grant a permanent injunction, but granted a temporary injunction to preserve the position pending the outcome of the claimant's appeal.
...
Ruling The Court held that the claimant had failed to advance any "unassailable knock-out evidence" which was capable of demonstrating that the emails were fake.
January 7, 2007 at 3:42 PM
Anonymous
said...
Yet another 'fixer' then? What does she get, another 'elevation' to the House of Lords? And on what pretext this time?
Then again, maybe she's just in it for the readies. Actually, I'd prefer to see that. At least we wouldn't be faced with the usual bollocks about 'Service to the community' etc.
January 7, 2007 at 3:47 PM
Anonymous
said...
No sooner do the Blair's get rid of Carole Caplin than another Rasputin-like witch takes her place. They really are like putty in the hands of these shysters
Cherie needs a lot of 'foundation', she should be sponsored by the trowel-makers union
January 7, 2007 at 4:15 PM
Anonymous
said...
I have just bought www.blairfoundation.net and would quite like to have an alternative website to Mr. Blair's planned one. Is this as stupid an idea as my wife suggests?
Probably, but I can't help thinking that makes it all the more interesting!
January 7, 2007 at 4:40 PM
Anonymous
said...
"I have just bought www.blairfoundation.net and would quite like to have an alternative website to Mr. Blair's planned one. Is this as stupid an idea as my wife suggests?" Not if you wanted to set up an on-line snake oil & swingers contact agency it wouldn't be.
January 7, 2007 at 4:44 PM
Anonymous
said...
Nicked from the Indy. Credit where credit is due, Guido.
January 7, 2007 at 4:45 PM
Anonymous
said...
Yeah.
Dont you give hat-tips when you steal from the dead-tree press?
January 7, 2007 at 7:09 PM
Anonymous
said...
O/T Guido, but the Hand of God has been at CH again - http://conservativehome.blogs.com/goldlist/2007/01/philippa_stroud.html
It is in the Telegraph and on the Guardian website as well, it was emailed to Guido. Thank you for your interest anyway.
January 7, 2007 at 7:13 PM
Anonymous
said...
Ah, the 'common knowledge/public domain' defence. Makes it look like a piss-poor revelation then, doesn't it Guido? Anybody happening along here might get the impression that you came up with this first. But that's the whole point, isn't it?
January 7, 2007 at 7:20 PM
Anonymous
said...
Anonymous 7:20 said...
Anybody happening along here might get the impression that you came up with this first.
That wasn't my impression. I took it to be another bit of information which would be of interest to readers of this site. Nothing more or less.
January 7, 2007 at 7:28 PM
Anonymous
said...
Yes, leave Guido alone. I for one trust him and you can trust me.
January 7, 2007 at 7:51 PM
Anonymous
said...
So the Anon prats think that Guido is in some sort of race to publish 'exclusives'. How bleeding stupid...
Did he claim exclusivity, you morons? Do get a grip on reality, for Heavens' sake.
January 7, 2007 at 8:06 PM
Anonymous
said...
I trust Guido!
January 7, 2007 at 8:12 PM
Anonymous
said...
she's not as utterly fuckable as Ruth Turner but she'd still get it big time!!
January 7, 2007 at 8:20 PM
Anonymous
said...
"It is in the Telegraph and on the Guardian website as well." Also the Sunday Times, and what of 't?
@ notafan, 4:17 PM, I have just bought www.blairfoundation.net and would quite like to have an alternative website to Mr. Blair's planned one. Is this as stupid an idea as my wife suggests?
"...she discussed assisting him with a business venture selling diet pills..."
Maybe, just maybe, Cherie has decided to do something about her load bearing buttocks and foundation-piling thighs and this is simply a bit of proposed vanity publishing to chart her progress to a sylph-like figure.
January 7, 2007 at 9:26 PM
Anonymous
said...
I hope you have a good lawyer, Mr Forks.
January 7, 2007 at 10:10 PM
Anonymous
said...
Oh dear. The last thing we need is a continued reason for Blair to stay in the public eye.
January 7, 2007 at 10:15 PM
Anonymous
said...
Me sham wife goes out selling matches every night. No idea why she cums ome covered in spunk every night. Ses she works wiv some fat arse self obssessed, self regarding blood drenched couple called the Bliars. Lovely couple apparently.
The semi female, uge titted male does tricks for killer cowboys.
Im just curious bout the labourite lobomites ooh post on ere. Any idea when the light will reach your lecturer/ worthless public sector job conciousness? Your Neo Labour project is dead. Along with Dr Kelly, and the thousands who've had power drills &/or acid applied to their brains in Iraq.
Your lip quivering boy is gonna get some Pinochet style hospitality at some stage.
January 7, 2007 at 10:17 PM
Anonymous
said...
No wonder Tony's on the turn having to cuddle up to blubber thighs every night.
It's enough to turn anyone queer.
January 7, 2007 at 10:18 PM
Anonymous
said...
Just a thought.........
How the Hell could you trust the opinion of anyone to run the country,or take us to War-
Hmm, how come the first thing that comes up on her new site is a link to Easily's guide to weight loss. Are they trying to tell us or Lady Muckbeth something? Good luck Cherie - you don't 'arf pick em luv (Daily Mail alert - for those who don't want to read their secretaries' newspaper)
Blair's been wearing foundation for years. It stops the sweat showing when he's telling porkies.
January 8, 2007 at 12:21 PM
Anonymous
said...
Indigo, thank you for the warning! It was a nice dream...
January 8, 2007 at 1:06 PM
Anonymous
said...
That bird is better looking than most of the totty you show.
January 8, 2007 at 1:34 PM
Anonymous
said...
Theo,
I couldn't speak for the trowel makers union, but the Honourable Guild of Trowellers and Dibbermakers would not wish to have their name sullied by such a connection.
On a more general note. We've got the Sith Institute; how long before a conspirator manages to make up a suitably offensive nickname for the Blair Foundation linked to some film or book, I wonder?
Bit of an amateurish operation by Ms Greene. When purchasing domain names it is usual practice to buy up all the variants. This to me suggests she is freelancing rather than doing this on the Blairs' behalf.
January 8, 2007 at 2:03 PM
Anonymous
said...
On the subject of variants, someone bought bliarfoundation.org.uk today. I had my eye on that but I guess I'm not quick enough.
January 8, 2007 at 4:46 PM
Anonymous
said...
The tiny state of Israel, albeit one or two steps removed, wouldn't have anything to do with this, I don't suppose?
January 8, 2007 at 7:43 PM
Anonymous
said...
Further footnote:
In March, 1994, Blair was introduced to Michael Levy at a dinner party at the Israeli embassy in London. Levy was a retired businessman who now spent his time raising money for Jewish pressure-groups. After this meeting, Levy acquired a new job, raising money for Tony Blair. According to Robin Ramsay (The Rise of New Labour, page 64), Levy raised over £7 million for Blair)
January 8, 2007 at 8:21 PM
Anonymous
said...
Martha Greene, like Carole Caplin, is Jewish. Is it forbidden to point this fact out or to ask why such a tiny minority so often pops up in 'colourful' roles in business and politics?
It is on this site, because Guido is part ofthe Judaeo-Catholic conspiracy.
And you keep boring on without wit about everyone who is Jewish. So Guido keeps deleting you.
You are a nut-job.
January 10, 2007 at 4:07 PM
Anonymous
said...
It is on this site, because Guido is part of the Judaeo-Catholic conspiracy.
Is that the standard of wit I should live up to? Anti-semitism is a proud Catholic tradition. That's why -- tho it seems to slipped your notice -- anti-Catholicism is a proud Jewish tradition.
And you keep boring on without wit about everyone who is Jewish. So Guido keeps deleting you.
No, I keep pointing out that Jews are hugely over-represented among those behaving in ways you disapprove of. You delete that inconvenient fact because it earns you brownie-points.
You are a nut-job.
Yes, a nut-job, tin-foiler, etc, etc. But lots of people agree with me who don't say so, because criticizing Jews is not a good career-move: see David Irving. Sucking up to them is a good career-move: see Blair and Cameron.
'Thank you too Michael for all the work that you have done. You have taken a few knocks, mainly on - in fact more than a few - mainly on my behalf. But when I look at what you have done with Jewish Care over the years, I mean quite apart from any politics, you can be very proud of what you have done.'
Who cares. You are a bore and basically you will get deleted for boring on.
January 10, 2007 at 8:47 PM
Anonymous
said...
Who cares. You are a bore and basically you will get deleted for boring on.
It's hard to believe you're 30-something and had an expensive education. Cyril's Theory of Permanent Adolescence lives again.
January 11, 2007 at 2:27 PM
Anonymous
said...
Just think; Would it not have been nice if the most famous British Blairs were a anti-communist sage and a gay acting piano playing entertainer.
Instead of a non-gay acting, guitar strumming, despotic socialist. And a money grabing, ugly old hagg, whos souse scouse father's sick bag had more talent to entertain the public.
50 comments:
not to be confused with blairfoundation.com which already exists. And if anyone's up for a laugh all variants of blair-foundation are unregistered plus a few variants of blairfoundation are still up for grabs.
By my reckoning (and, according to my calendar), 4 November 2006 wasn't last week. Or even last month. </pedant>
The Human Rights Act doesn't always work for Tony's cronies
On 10 October 2004, the Mail on Sunday published an article suggesting that there was a link between Martha Greene, a businesswoman and close friend of Cherie Blair, and Peter Foster. The newspaper stated that it had seen emails between Foster, a convicted fraudster, and Ms Greene in which she discussed assisting him with a business venture selling diet pills.
Within days the claimant's solicitors had complained to the newspaper stating that she did not send any of the emails which the paper referred to and that she was not connected with Foster in any way. At the same time, the newspaper wrote to the claimant asking for details about the contents of the emails in preparation for a further article the following Sunday. The claimant replied that the emails were forgeries and that she opposed publication of what she claimed were the false allegations of a conman.
The claimant sought an injunction on Saturday 16 October to restrain the Mail on Sunday from publishing the proposed article about her. Mr Justice Fulford refused to grant a permanent injunction, but granted a temporary injunction to preserve the position pending the outcome of the claimant's appeal.
...
Ruling
The Court held that the claimant had failed to advance any "unassailable knock-out evidence" which was capable of demonstrating that the emails were fake.
Yet another 'fixer' then? What does she get, another 'elevation' to the House of Lords? And on what pretext this time?
Then again, maybe she's just in it for the readies. Actually, I'd prefer to see that. At least we wouldn't be faced with the usual bollocks about 'Service to the community' etc.
No sooner do the Blair's get rid of Carole Caplin than another Rasputin-like witch takes her place. They really are like putty in the hands of these shysters
Cherie needs a lot of 'foundation', she should be sponsored by the trowel-makers union
I have just bought www.blairfoundation.net and would quite like to have an alternative website to Mr. Blair's planned one. Is this as stupid an idea as my wife suggests?
Probably, but I can't help thinking that makes it all the more interesting!
"I have just bought www.blairfoundation.net and would quite like to have an alternative website to Mr. Blair's planned one. Is this as stupid an idea as my wife suggests?"
Not if you wanted to set up an on-line snake oil & swingers contact agency it wouldn't be.
Nicked from the Indy. Credit where credit is due, Guido.
Yeah.
Dont you give hat-tips when you steal from the dead-tree press?
O/T Guido, but the Hand of God has been at CH again - http://conservativehome.blogs.com/goldlist/2007/01/philippa_stroud.html
Anonymongs,
It is in the Telegraph and on the Guardian website as well, it was emailed to Guido. Thank you for your interest anyway.
Ah, the 'common knowledge/public domain' defence. Makes it look like a piss-poor revelation then, doesn't it Guido? Anybody happening along here might get the impression that you came up with this first. But that's the whole point, isn't it?
Anonymous 7:20 said...
Anybody happening along here might get the impression that you came up with this first.
That wasn't my impression. I took it to be another bit of information which would be of interest to readers of this site. Nothing more or less.
Yes, leave Guido alone. I for one trust him and you can trust me.
So the Anon prats think that Guido is in some sort of race to publish 'exclusives'. How bleeding stupid...
Did he claim exclusivity, you morons? Do get a grip on reality, for Heavens' sake.
I trust Guido!
she's not as utterly fuckable as Ruth Turner but she'd still get it big time!!
"It is in the Telegraph and on the Guardian website as well." Also the Sunday Times, and what of 't?
Keep flagellating the body politic, dear boy.
@ notafan, 4:17 PM, I have just bought www.blairfoundation.net and would quite like to have an alternative website to Mr. Blair's planned one. Is this as stupid an idea as my wife suggests?
It's not stupid but, thanks to the precedent set by the One in a Million Order, your project is likely to run out of road quite quickly. Background here, to the One in a Million judgement.
Sero said:
"...she discussed assisting him with a business venture selling diet pills..."
Maybe, just maybe, Cherie has decided to do something about her load bearing buttocks and foundation-piling thighs and this is simply a bit of proposed vanity publishing to chart her progress to a sylph-like figure.
I hope you have a good lawyer, Mr Forks.
Oh dear. The last thing we need is a continued reason for Blair to stay in the public eye.
Me sham wife goes out selling matches every night.
No idea why she cums ome covered in spunk every night.
Ses she works wiv some fat arse self obssessed, self regarding blood drenched couple called the Bliars. Lovely couple apparently.
The semi female, uge titted male does tricks for killer cowboys.
Im just curious bout the labourite lobomites ooh post on ere.
Any idea when the light will reach your lecturer/ worthless public sector job conciousness?
Your Neo Labour project is dead.
Along with Dr Kelly, and the thousands who've had power drills &/or acid applied to their brains in Iraq.
Your lip quivering boy is gonna get some Pinochet style hospitality at some stage.
No wonder Tony's on the turn having to cuddle up to blubber thighs every night.
It's enough to turn anyone queer.
Just a thought.........
How the Hell could you trust the opinion of anyone to run the country,or take us to War-
Look at his personal track record
Would you choose a man who chose Blubber Thighs?
Makes you think, doesn't it?
Hmm, how come the first thing that comes up on her new site is a link to Easily's guide to weight loss. Are they trying to tell us or Lady Muckbeth something? Good luck Cherie - you don't 'arf pick em luv (Daily Mail alert - for those who don't want to read their secretaries' newspaper)
I see there is an opening for an Archbishop...maybe his worthyness would like to apply....I'm sure the Poles are ready for him......
Wow. Can this possibly be the same crowd that went after Sion Simon for his 'personal attacks'? I hope not.
Anonymous said...
Wow. Can this possibly be the same crowd that went after Sion Simon for his 'personal attacks'? I hope not.
I see a NuLab anonymong troll is at "work" bright and early.
So, it's former education secretary Ruth Kelly who's the hypocrite sending her kid to private school.
It's 10 Hail Mary's, an Act of Contrition, and 20 strokes of the lash for you Ruth.
NuLab? Ha! Nice angle from Guido's own personal astroturf department.
OOOh pleeeese (writhes in ecstasy)
Why, when I hear the words Blair & Foundation, does the image of a concrete truck and a large hole in the ground come to mind?
Blair's been wearing foundation for years. It stops the sweat showing when he's telling porkies.
Indigo, thank you for the warning! It was a nice dream...
That bird is better looking than most of the totty you show.
Theo,
I couldn't speak for the trowel makers union, but the Honourable Guild of Trowellers and Dibbermakers would not wish to have their name sullied by such a connection.
On a more general note. We've got the Sith Institute; how long before a conspirator manages to make up a suitably offensive nickname for the Blair Foundation linked to some film or book, I wonder?
Bit of an amateurish operation by Ms Greene. When purchasing domain names it is usual practice to buy up all the variants. This to me suggests she is freelancing rather than doing this on the Blairs' behalf.
On the subject of variants, someone bought bliarfoundation.org.uk today. I had my eye on that but I guess I'm not quick enough.
The tiny state of Israel, albeit one or two steps removed, wouldn't have anything to do with this, I don't suppose?
Further footnote:
In March, 1994, Blair was introduced to Michael Levy at a dinner party at the Israeli embassy in London. Levy was a retired businessman who now spent his time raising money for Jewish pressure-groups. After this meeting, Levy acquired a new job, raising money for Tony Blair. According to Robin Ramsay (The Rise of New Labour, page 64), Levy raised over £7 million for Blair)
Martha Greene, like Carole Caplin, is Jewish. Is it forbidden to point this fact out or to ask why such a tiny minority so often pops up in 'colourful' roles in business and politics?
It is on this site, because Guido is part ofthe Judaeo-Catholic conspiracy.
And you keep boring on without wit about everyone who is Jewish. So Guido keeps deleting you.
You are a nut-job.
It is on this site, because Guido is part of the Judaeo-Catholic conspiracy.
Is that the standard of wit I should live up to? Anti-semitism is a proud Catholic tradition. That's why -- tho it seems to slipped your notice -- anti-Catholicism is a proud Jewish tradition.
And you keep boring on without wit about everyone who is Jewish. So Guido keeps deleting you.
No, I keep pointing out that Jews are hugely over-represented among those behaving in ways you disapprove of. You delete that inconvenient fact because it earns you brownie-points.
You are a nut-job.
Yes, a nut-job, tin-foiler, etc, etc. But lots of people agree with me who don't say so, because criticizing Jews is not a good career-move: see David Irving. Sucking up to them is a good career-move: see Blair and Cameron.
'Thank you too Michael for all the work that you have done. You have taken a few knocks, mainly on - in fact more than a few - mainly on my behalf. But when I look at what you have done with Jewish Care over the years, I mean quite apart from any politics, you can be very proud of what you have done.'
http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page9466.asp
Who cares. You are a bore and basically you will get deleted for boring on.
Who cares. You are a bore and basically you will get deleted for boring on.
It's hard to believe you're 30-something and had an expensive education. Cyril's Theory of Permanent Adolescence lives again.
Just think; Would it not have been nice if the most famous British Blairs were a anti-communist sage and a gay acting piano playing entertainer.
Instead of a non-gay acting, guitar strumming, despotic socialist. And a money grabing, ugly old hagg, whos souse scouse father's sick bag had more talent to entertain the public.
We can now only dream.
Isn't blairscam.org quicker to type in?